What Our Analysts Are Saying
Real experiences from finance professionals who've sharpened their corporate finance skills through our programs. These aren't scripted testimonials—just honest feedback from people navigating the same challenges you might be facing.
Experiences From The Field
We asked graduates to share what actually changed after completing our programs. Some saw immediate applications in their work, others appreciated the confidence boost. Everyone's journey looks different.
I was struggling with valuation models at my firm in Ho Chi Minh City. The DCF module helped me understand the logic behind the numbers instead of just plugging values into templates. My manager noticed the difference in how I explained projections during client meetings.
Coming from an accounting background, I needed to bridge into corporate finance. The financial modeling section gave me practical skills I could use right away. What surprised me most was how much time the instructors spent on common mistakes—saved me from embarrassing errors in actual work.
Why People Choose This Path
Most participants come to us with specific gaps they're trying to fill. Maybe they understand the theory but freeze when building actual models. Or they've been doing financial analysis for years using templates without really understanding what drives the outputs.
What tends to resonate is the focus on practical application. We don't just teach formulas—we walk through messy real-world scenarios where data is incomplete and assumptions need defending. That's where people say they get the most value.
Several analysts mentioned they wished they'd taken these courses earlier in their careers. One participant from Hanoi said she'd been "winging it" for two years before finally understanding the underlying principles. Better late than never, though the foundational knowledge makes everything else click into place.
The program runs from September through November 2025, with enrollment opening in July. That timeline works for analysts looking to upskill before year-end planning cycles or those preparing for role transitions in early 2026.
Questions About Reviews
Common questions about how we collect and present participant feedback.
How do you verify these reviews are genuine?
We only publish reviews from verified participants—people who completed at least 80% of a program. After course completion, we send survey requests through our learning platform. Reviews include the participant's cohort and completion date, which we can verify internally. We don't edit testimonials beyond basic grammar corrections.
Do you publish negative feedback too?
Absolutely. Not every program fits every person's needs or learning style. We include constructive criticism because it helps prospective students make informed decisions. The most common complaint is about pacing—some find modules too fast, others too slow. That's why we're testing self-paced options for the 2026 cohort.
What's your typical response rate on surveys?
Around 60-65% of graduates respond to our post-program surveys. We send three reminders over a four-week period. Higher response rates come from cohorts that had more interactive elements—live case studies and group work seem to create more investment in providing feedback.
Can I speak with past participants directly?
Some alumni volunteer as program ambassadors. If you're seriously considering enrollment and want an unfiltered perspective, we can connect you with someone from a similar background. Just mention it when you contact us. We won't push you toward a sale—these conversations are about helping you make the right choice for your situation.